Prediction of Jae Hwan Kim vs Ju-Hae Moon Head-to-Head, At
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Hwan Kim vs J. Moon

Jae Hwan Kim
KOR
l
w
l
w
w
w
l
w
w
l
2
Win
2
Played
0
Win
31
Age
37
6'0" (183 cm)
Height
5'7" (170 cm)
794
C. Rank
Ret.
794
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
Left-Handed
Plays
Left-Handed

Ju-Hae Moon
KOR
l
w
w
w
l
w
w
w
l
l
2
Win
2
Played
0
Win
31
Age
37
6'0" (183 cm)
Height
5'7" (170 cm)
794
C. Rank
Ret.
794
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
Left-Handed
Plays
Left-Handed
Head-to-head: Kim 2 - 0 Moon
They have played 4 sets in total, with Jae Hwan Kim winning 4 and Ju-Hae Moon winning 0. The last match between Jae Hwan Kim and Ju-Hae Moon was at the Korea F4 (Gimcheon), 16-08-2018, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Jae Hwan Kim getting the victory 6-2 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Kim | 2 |
| Moon | 0 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(QF) Korea F4 (Gimcheon)(08-16-18)
Jae Hwan Kim
6
6
Ju-Hae Moon
2
2
(QF) Korea F2 (Gyeongsan)(06-14-18)
Jae Hwan Kim
6
6
Ju-Hae Moon
4
1
J. H. Kim vs J. Moon H2H Profile
J. H. Kim vs J. Moon Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jae Hwan Kim has won 34.75% of points on their second serve, while Ju-Hae Moon has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jae Hwan Kim, in recent form, has won 41.10% of their opponent's second serve points, while Ju-Hae Moon has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 19.42% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Jae Hwan Kim has saved 52.08% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ju-Hae Moon has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Jae Hwan Kim has won 61.54% of matches played (W/L 8/5), with Ju-Hae Moon winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Jae Hwan Kim has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 17/11), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 122/81). Ju-Hae Moon has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 15/11), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 49% (W/L 46/48).
- Player level: In the last year, Jae Hwan Kim has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 61.54% of matches (W/L 8/5), where as Ju-Hae Moon has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Jae Hwan Kim winning 2 times and Ju-Hae Moon being victorious 0 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Jae Hwan Kim winning 4 and Ju-Hae Moon winning 0.
- The last match between Jae Hwan Kim and Ju-Hae Moon was at the Korea F4 (Gimcheon), 16-08-2018, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Jae Hwan Kim getting the victory 6-2 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:45:30.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jae Hwan Kim has played against opponents with an average rank of 187.08 while Ju-Hae Moon has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jae Hwan Kim has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ju-Hae Moon has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Jae Hwan Kim has converted 12.50% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ju-Hae Moon has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Jae Hwan Kim vs Ju-Hae Moon Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. H. Kim vs J. Moon H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 24 | Games Won | 9 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 14 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 1:45:30 | Average Match Time | 1:45:30 |
| 55% (65/118) | 1st Serve % | 60% (58/97) |
| 78% (51/65) | 1st Serve Win % | 47% (27/58) |
| 32% (17/53) | 2nd Serve Win % | 28% (11/39) |
| 48% (12/25) | Break Pts Won % | 42% (5/12) |
| 61% (59/97) | Return Points Win % | 42% (50/118) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/2) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Kim 37%, Moon 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Kim 45%, Moon 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Kim 55%, Moon 0%.
J. H. Kim Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-3 6-2 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-1 6-1 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-2 6-2 | ||
R1 | L | 6-1 6-1 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-3 6-3 | ||
J. Moon Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 6-2 6-2 | ||
R1 | L | 1-6 6-4 5-2 ret. | ||
Q3 | W | 3-6 6-3 10-6 | ||
Q2 | W | 6-2 6-2 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-1 6-2 | ||

J. H. Kim vs J. Moon Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60.17% (142/94) | YTD Win/Loss | 52.00% (65/60) |
| 59.85% (310/208) | Sets Win/Loss | 51.31% (137/130) |
| 53.77% (2523/2169) | Games Win/Loss | 50.47% (1134/1113) |
| 60.10% (122/81) | Hard Win/Loss | 48.94% (46/48) |
| 60.71% (17/11) | Clay Win/Loss | 57.69% (15/11) |
| 60.00% (3/2) | Indoor Hard W/L | 80.00% (4/1) |
| 0.13 | Aces Per Game | 0.04 |
| 293 | Aces Total | 46 |
| 0.15 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.16 |
| 333 | Total Double Faults | 179 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 395.9 | Average Opponent Rank | 406.51 |
| 56% (3210/5713) | 1st Serve % | 69% (2148/3118) |
| 69% (2226/3210) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (1266/2148) |
| 47% (1183/2503) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (396/970) |
| 41% (246/605) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (190/378) |
| 40% (2330/5777) | Return Points Win % | 45% (1426/3182) |
| 35.29% (6/11) | Challenger W/L | 23.08% (3/10) |
| 62.10% (136/83) | Futures W/L | 55.36% (62/50) |
| 60% (134/224) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 51% (61/119) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 62% (28/45) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 78% (7/9) |
| 40% (22/55) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (9/17) |
| 86% (148/127) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 93% (61/57) |
| 14% (148/20) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 7% (61/4) |
| 15% (88/13) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (64/8) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
12:00 PM 18/11/25
Prediction02:00 AM 18/11/25
Prediction04:00 AM 18/11/25
Prediction12:00 PM 18/11/25
Prediction12:00 PM 18/11/25
Prediction08:00 AM 18/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Simona Waltert vs Solana Sierra Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Linda Noskova vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Iga Swiatek vs Gabriela Lee Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group B – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Carlos Alcaraz vs Jannik Sinner Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Ella Seidel vs Hanne Vandewinkel Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group F – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Prediction Of Alcaraz Vs Sinner H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
Top Predictions Today
22:00
H2H 0-0
00:05
H2H 0-0
00:05
H2H 0-0
01:45
H2H 0-0
02:00
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Bergamo Challenger
Italy
Florianopolis Challenger
Brazil
Guayaquil Challenger
Ecuador
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Bhubaneswar
India
M15 Gimcheon
Korea, Rep.
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M25 Antalya
Turkey
M25 Heraklion
Greece